THE PROBLEM OF INTEGRITY OF MODERN BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58407/bht.3.25.21

Keywords:

academic integrity, biology, ecology, scientific research, principles

Abstract

In the context of the need to comply with the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, which serves the European research community as a basis for self-regulation in all scientific and academic disciplines and for all research institutions, a review of the problem of integrity in modern biomedical and environmental research was conducted.

Purpose of the work. The purpose of the paper is to highlight principles and practices for promoting integrity in modern biomedical and environmental research.

Methodology. The analysis and critical assessment of modern published works on the problem of academic integrity, a review of the level of study of the scientific problem were applied. For this, general methods of scientific knowledge are used, such as analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison. The critical assessment involved an assessment of the validity of the conclusions in the analyzed publications, their novelty.

Scientific novelty. The guiding principles of research integrity, particularly biomedical and environmental, are analyzed, which are the basis of a reliable scientific result. Practices to promote research integrity include the use of sound research methods, effective statistics, recording of interim results, as well as the protection of human participants in research and the humane treatment of animals. The issues of academic integrity related to the use of artificial intelligence in the research space and scientific peer review are emphasized.

Conclusions. Integrity in scientific research, including biomedical and environmental research, involves the intellectual honesty of the researcher and the application of practices aimed primarily at the use of rigorous research methods, the appropriate application of statistical models, and the control of bias, which ensures the validity of conclusions. To strengthen research integrity, concern for the quality of the research environment plays an important role. Given that AI is already creating significant challenges for the educational space, the problem of replacing research authenticity and maintaining academic integrity in the peer review process of scientific publications arises. Developing mechanisms that will prevent this requires further research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALLEA (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity – Revised Edition 2023. All European Academies. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/european-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity_horizon_en.pdf

Armond, A. C. V., Cobey, K. D., & Moher, D. (2024). Research Integrity definitions and challenges. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 171, 111367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111367

Balalle, H. & Pannilage, S. (2025). Reassessing academic integrity in the age of AI: a systematic literature review on AI and academic integrity. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101299.

Chávez A. L. C. T., Cordero C. R. Z., Orellana L. M. G., Tapia R. D. C., Aguila O. E. P., Pérez L. A. C., Ramí-rez A. A. V., Carranza C. P. M., Velasquez W. L. V., & Gonzáles J. L. A. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence in promoting academic integrity in education: A systematic review. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v33i.415

Ciubotariu, I. I., & Bosch, G. (2022). Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication. BMC Res Notes, 15, 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06065-5

Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Li, W., Gurrin, L. C., & Mol, B. W. (2022). Violation of research integrity principles occurs more often than we think. Reproductive Biomedicine online, 44(2), 207–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.022

NRC & IMC (2002). Integrity in scientific research: creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments. National Academies Press (US). https://doi.org/10.17226/10430

Paryzhak, S. & Vari, S. G. (2024). Scientific integrity in biomedical research is a global problem. Ukrainian Biochemical Journal, 96(2), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.15407/ubj96.02.012

Popovich, G., Mason, T. J., Drobniak, S. M., Marquez, T. A., Potts, J., Ju, R., Altwegg, R., Burns, K. K. I., McCarthy, M. A., Johnston, A., Nakagawa, S., McMillan, L., Devarajan, K., Taggart, P. L., Wunderlich, A., Meir, M. M., Martinez-Lanfranco, J. A., Lagisz, M., & Pottier, P. (2024). Four principles for improving statistical ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14270

Resnik, D. B., & Shamoo, A. E. (2011). The singapore statement on research integrity. Accountability in Research, 18(2), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.557296

Sugiharto, D. Y. P., Kholiq, A., Nusantara, B. A., Sutoyo, A., & Arum, L. N. (2023). The effect of guidance and counselling services based on an ecological approach to academic integrity. Social Work and Education, 10 (1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.23.1.3

Steneck N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00022268

Winthrop University (n.d.). Biology. Policy on Academic Integrity. https://www.winthrop.edu/cas/biology/policy-on-academic-integrity.aspx

Zwart, H., & Ter Meulen, R. (2019). Addressing research integrity challenges: from penalising individual perpetrators to fostering research ecosystem quality care. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 15(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-019-0093-6

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

Lukash О. ., Tkaczenko Г. ., Szikura А., Mekhed О., & Kurhaluk Н. (2025). THE PROBLEM OF INTEGRITY OF MODERN BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH. Biota. Human. Technology, (3), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.58407/bht.3.25.21

Issue

Section

RESEARCH INTEGRITY

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>