METHODS OF CONTROLLING THE SPREAD OF THE INVASIVE SPECIES ULMUS PUMILA L. NEAR RAILWAY TRACKS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58407/bht.2.25.1

Keywords:

invasive species, phytoinvasion, Ulmus pumila (L.), population control, methods of combating invasions

Abstract

Purpose of the work. To investigate the effectiveness of various methods of controlling populations of invasive species, in particular mechanical, manual method and chemical methods of controlling the spread of the invasive species Ulmus pumila L.

Methodology. Within the framework of the study, we applied three main methods of controlling the invasive species U. pumila, namely: a mechanical method, which consisted in mowing the above-ground part of plants; a manual method, in particular, pruning young shoots using a hand saw; a chemical method, which involved local treatment with herbicide (monoammonium salt of glyphosate) of individual shoots. Studies of the effectiveness of these methods were carried out on three plots measuring 3 × 2 m each, where different control methods were used. The effectiveness of these methods was assessed based on changes in the population of plants of the studied species in each individual plot.

Scientific novelty. Comparison of the effectiveness of various methods of controlling invasive plant species, in particular U. pumila, in growing conditions near railway tracks on the southwestern outskirts of the city of Chernihiv. For the first time, this work has carried out a comparative analysis of mechanical, manual and chemical methods for controlling the spread of an invasive species.

Conclusions. It was established that the mechanical method is the most promising and safest for controlling the U. pumila population in the conditions of the studied region. The chemical method also demonstrated high efficiency, but is economically expensive and carries risks of negative impact on the ecosystem. The manual method, which involves manual pruning of young shoots, turned out to be the least effective due to significant time costs and the impossibility of completely removing all young shoots. To achieve a sustainable result, it is important to consider the possibility of combining different methods, which will allow achieving a longer-lasting effect. At the same time, further research is needed to assess the long-term effectiveness of each method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chernysh, V. (2023, 16-18 May). Methods of combating invasive plant species [Conference presentation abstract]. The 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Scientific Paradigm in the Context of Technologies and Society Development” Geneva, Switzerland. https://archive.interconf.center/index.php/ conference-proceeding/article/view/3366/3399 (in Ukrainian)

Черниш, В. Методи боротьби з інвазивними видами рослин. Scientific Paradigm in the Context of Technologies and Society Development: Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference, 16-18 May, 2023. Geneva, Switzerland. 2023. SPC: “InterConf”. Protonique, 2023. P. 421–422.

Danko, Yu., Voitkiv, A., & Kobyletska, M. (2024). Spread of invasive plant species in the territory of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Biology, 93, 29–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/ vlubs.2024.93.04 (in Ukrainian)

Данко Ю., Войтків А., Кобилецька М. Поширення інвазійних видів рослин на території Українських Карпат. Вісник Львівського університету. Серія Біологія. 2024. № 93. С. 29–45. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.30970/vlubs.2024.93.04

Dyderski, M. K., & Jagodziński, A. M. (2020). Impact of Invasive Tree Species on Natural Regeneration Species Composition, Diversity, and Density. Forests, 11(4), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040456

Gala-Czekaj, D., Synowiec, A., & Dąbkowska, T. (2021). Self-Renewal of Invasive Goldenrods (Solidago spp.) as a Result of Different Mechanical Management of Fallow. Agronomy, 11(6), 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/ agronomy11061065

Gentili, R., Schaffner, U., Martinoli, A., & Citterio, S. (2021). Invasive alien species and biodiversity: impacts and management. Biodiversity, 22(1–2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2021.1929484

Hejda, M., Hanzelka, J., Kadlec, T., Štrobl, M., Pyšek, P., Reif, J. (2017). Impacts of an invasive tree across trophic levels: Species richness, community composition and resident species’ traits. Divers. Distrib., 23, 997–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12596

Hirsch, H., Brunet, J., Zalapa, J.E. et al. (2017). Intra- and interspecific hybridization in invasive Siberian elm. Biol. Invasions, 19, 1889–1904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1404-6

Hirsch, H., Hensen, I., Wesche, K., Renison, D., Wypior, C., Hartmann, M., & von Wehrden, H. (2017). Non-native populations of an invasive tree outperform their native conspecifics. AoB PLANTS, 8, plw071. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/aobpla/plw071

Hort, D., Zaharia, A., Buta, E., Zaharia, D., & Cantor, M. (2015). The Radiograph of an invasive species (Ulmus pumila). AGRICULTURA, 93 (1-2), 64-68. https://doi.org/10.15835/arspa.v93i1-2.11241

Kolodeeva, K., & Andrienko, O. (2023, April 21). Glyphosate – benefits and dangers [Conference presentation abstract]. The All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference “Achievements and Prospects in the Field of Production, Processing and Storage of Agricultural Products”, Kropyvnytskyi.

Колодєєва К., Андрієнко О. Гліфосат – користь та небезпека. Досягнення та перспективи галузі виробництва, переробки і зберігання сільськогосподарської продукції: матеріали Всеукр. наук.-практ. конф. (Кропивницький, 21 квітня 2023 р.). Кропивницький: ЦНТУ, 2023 С. 48 – 51.

Leslie, A., & Westbrooks, R. (2012). Invasive Plant Management Issues and Challenges in the United States: 2011 Overview (ACS Symposium Series). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2011-1073

Linders, T. E. W., Schaffner, U., Eschen, R., Abebe, A., Choge, S. K., Nigatu, L., Mbaabu, P. R., Shiferaw, H., & Allan, E. (2019). Direct and indirect effects of invasive species: Biodiversity loss is a major mechanism by which an invasive tree affects ecosystem functioning. Journal of Ecology, 107(6) 2660-2672. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1365-2745.13268

Lorenzo, P., & Morais, M. C. (2023). Strategies for the Management of Aggressive Invasive Plant Species. Plants, 12(13), 2482. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132482

Lyubinska, L., & Маtvieiev, М. (2021). Invasive species in the flora and fauna of Podilski Tovtry National Nature Park (Ukraine). Geo&Bio, 20, 70–78. http://doi.org/10.15407/gb2009 (in Ukrainian)

Любінська Л. Г., Матвєєв М. Д. Інвазивні види флори та фауни Національного природного парку Подільські Товтри (Україна). Geo&Bio. 2021. № 20. С. 70–78. http://doi.org/10.15407/gb2009

Miller, J. H., Manning S. T., & Enloe, S. F. (2015). A management guide for invasive plants in southern forests. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station. https://www. srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/gtr/gtr_srs131.pdf

Mosyakin, A. S. (2012). Modern methods of biological control (biological regulation) of the activity of invasive plants: examples and prospects for application. Scientific foundations of the preservation of biotic diversity, 3(10), 93-109. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nozbr_2012_3(10)_1_9. (in Ukrainian)

Мосякін А. С. Сучасні методи біологічного контролю (біологічного регулювання) активності інвазійних рослин: приклади й перспективи застосування. Наукові основи збереження біотичної різноманітності. 2012. Т. 3(10), № 1. С. 93-109. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nozbr_2012_3(10)_1_9

Reynolds, L.V., Perry, L.G., Shafroth, P. B., Katz, G., & Norton, A. (2022). Invasion of Siberian Elm (Ulmus pumila) Along the South Platte River: the Roles of Seed Source, Human Influence, and River Geomorphology. Wetlands, 42(10), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-021-01516-4

USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. (2017). Field Guide for Managing Siberian Elm in the Southwest United States. Albuquerque. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-A13-PURL-gpo89738/pdf/ GOVPUB-A13-PURL-gpo89738.pdf

Verbrugge, L. N. H., Hoop, L., Aukema, R., Beringen, R., Creemers, R. C. M., Duinen, G. A., Hollander, H., Hullu, E., Scherpenisse, M., Spikmans, F., Turnhout, C. A. M., Wijnhoven, S., & Leuven, R. S. E. W. (2019). Lessons learned from rapid environmental risk assessments for prioritization of alien species using expert panels. Journal of Environmental Management, 249, 109405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109405

Weidlich, E. W. A., Flórido, F. G., Sorrini, T. B., & Brancalion, P. H. S. (2020). Controlling invasive plant species in ecological restoration: A global review. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(9) 1806–1817. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1365-2664.13656

Zavialova, L. V., Protopopova, V. V., Kucher, O. O., Ryff, L. E., & Shevera, M. V. (2021). Plant invasions in Ukraine. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 9(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2021-0020

Published

2025-07-10

How to Cite

Stupak Ю. (2025). METHODS OF CONTROLLING THE SPREAD OF THE INVASIVE SPECIES ULMUS PUMILA L. NEAR RAILWAY TRACKS. Biota. Human. Technology, (2), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.58407/bht.2.25.1

Issue

Section

PHYTOBIOTA