DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK-BASED APPROACH TO MEAT PRODUCT SAFETY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58407/bht.1.26.15

Keywords:

risk-oriented approach, meat product safety, safe-by-design, water activity, structural design of food products

Abstract

Purpose of the work. The aim of this study is to summarise and systematically analyse contemporary risk-oriented approaches to ensuring the safety of meat products intended for children and sensitive population groups, as well as to substantiate the feasibility of using product shape and internal structure as engineering tools for reducing technological risks in the production of dried meat products.

Methodology. The methodology of the study is based on a review and analytical approach employing structural-logical, comparative and critical analysis of current scientific publications and regulatory documents: Codex Alimentarius, ISO 22000, norms of EFSA etc. related to food safety management. The analysis is conducted from a risk-oriented perspective, taking into account the multi-barrier concept, the role of water activity, dehydration kinetics, and the influence of product geometry and internal structure on the formation of microbiological stability in meat products.

Scientific novelty. Scientific novelty lies in the development of a generalised conceptual model in which the shape and internal structure of dried meat products are considered as active engineering factors for risk management. An interpretation of safe-by-design principles in food technologies is proposed as an applied mechanism of “built-in safety”, enabling the reduction of technological risks through product and process design rather than exclusively through formulation- or ingredient-based solutions.

Conclusions. The conclusions indicate that, for meat products intended for children and sensitive population groups, a risk-oriented approach should be combined with engineering control of product shape and internal structure. Such an approach contributes to reducing the duration of product exposure to potentially hazardous conditions, levelling water activity profiles, and decreasing dependence on preservative additives without compromising safety and quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Álvarez, S., Álvarez, C., Hamill, R., Mullen, A. M., & O’Neill, E. (2021). Drying dynamics of meat highlighting areas of relevance to dry-aging of beef. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 20, e12845. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12845

Aksoy, A., Karasu, S., Akcicek, A., & Kayacan, S. (2019). Effects of different drying methods on drying kinetics, microstructure, color, and the rehydration ratio of minced meat. Foods, 8(6), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8060216

Beňo, F., Kostlán, J., Pivoňka, J., Pohůnek, V., & Ševčík, R. (2023). Water activity of Czech dry-cured meat products: Influence of sampling point and sample preparation method. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 41(5), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.17221/99/2023-CJFS

Brykova, T. (2024). HACCP system in the production of semi-finished products. Commodity Science, Technologies and Engineering, 50(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.31617/2.2024(50)07 (in Ukrainian)

Брикова Т. Система HACCP при виробництві напівфабрикатів. Міжнародний науково-практичний журнал "Товари і ринки". 2024. No 2 (50). С. 93–109. https://doi.org/10.31617/2.2024(50)07

CAC. (1999). Principles and guidelines for the conduct of microbiological risk assessment (CAC/GL-30). Codex Alimentarius Commission.

Cascone, G., Setegn, H. G., Miccio, M., & Diaferia, C. (2015). A tool for modelling and simulation of irregular shape and shrinking salami during drying. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 43, 103. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1543018

Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2022). General principles of food hygiene (CXC 1-1969): Annex-Hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) system and guidelines for its application. FAO/WHO. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/codes-of-practice/en/

Crank, J. (1975). The mathematics of diffusion (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS). (2017). Re-evaluation of nitrites (E 249–250) and nitrates (E 251–252) as food additives. EFSA Journal, 15(6), e04786. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4786

European Commission. (2025). Safe and sustainable by design: Chemicals and advanced materials. Research and Innovation. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/industrial-research-and-innovation/chemicals-and-advanced-materials/safe-and-sustainable-design_en

European Food Safety Authority. (2017, June 15). EFSA explains risk assessment: Nitrites and nitrates added to food. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/corporate/pub/nitritesandnitrates170614

Fontana, A. J. (2000). Water activity’s role in food safety and quality. Food Safety Magazine, 6(2), 54–59.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2017). Food safety risk management: Evidence-informed policies and decisions, considering multiple factors. FAO. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/58107321-1049-4897-85cc-621a4f4ad986/content

Gibson, A. M., Bratchell, N., & Roberts, T. A. (1988). Predicting microbial growth: The effect of water activity on growth of Salmonella. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 6(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(88)90058-9

International Finance Corporation. (2020). Food safety handbook: A practical guide for building a robust food safety management system. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). Food safety management systems—Requirements for any organization in the food chain (ISO 22000:2018). https://www.iso.org/standard/65464.html

Kabil, E., Çakır, M. A., Yalınkılıç, B., & Başlar, M. (2025). Quality and microstructural changes in salted goose meat dried by hot-air, infrared, and microwave techniques. Processes, 13(10), 3223. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13103223

Kim, D.-H., Kim, Y. J., Shin, D.-M., Lee, J. H., & Han, S. G. (2022). Drying characteristics and physicochemical properties of semi-dried restructured sausage depend on initial moisture content. Food Science of Animal Resources, 42(3), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2022.e12

Labuza, T. P., & Altunakar, B. (2007). Water activity prediction and moisture sorption isotherms. In G. V. Barbosa-Cánovas et al. (Eds.), Water activity in foods (pp. 109–154). Blackwell Publishing.

Leistner, L. (2000). Basic aspects of food preservation by hurdle technology. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 55(1–3), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00161-6

Lelieveld, H. L. M., Mostert, M. A., & Curiel, G. J. (2014). Hygienic design of food processing equipment. In H. L. M. Lelieveld, J. T. Holah, & D. Napper (Eds.), Hygiene in food processing (2nd ed., pp. 91–141). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098634.2.91

Li, W., Zhou, Y., Du, Q., et al. (2025). Research progress on the effects of drying methods on the eating quality of dried meat products. Meat Research, 39(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.7506/rlyj1001-8123-20240902-233

Mayor, L., & Sereno, A. M. (2004). Modelling shrinkage during convective drying of food materials: A review. Journal of Food Engineering, 61(3), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00144-4

Mediani, A., Hamezah, H. S., Faidruz, A., Mahadi, N., Chan, S., Rohani, E., Che Lah, N. H., Azlan, U., Khairul Annuar, N. A., Azman, N., Bunawan, H., Sarian, M., Kamal, N., & Abas, F. (2022). A comprehensive review of drying meat products and the associated effects and changes. Frontiers in Nutrition, 9, 1057366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1057366

Nauta, M. J. (2000). Separation of uncertainty and variability in quantitative microbial risk assessment models. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 57(1–2), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00225-7

Patarata, L., Fernandes, L., Silva, J. A., & Fraqueza, M. J. (2022). The risk of salt reduction in dry-cured sausage assessed by the influence on water activity and the survival of Salmonella. Foods, 11(3), 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030444

Ross, T., & McMeekin, T. A. (2003). Modeling microbial growth within food safety risk assessments. Risk Analysis, 23(1), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00300

Sánchez Jiménez, A., Puelles, R., Pérez-Fernández, M., Gómez-Fernández, P., Barruetabeña, L., Jacobsen, N. R., Suarez-Merino, B., Micheletti, C., Manier, N., Trouiller, B., & Navas, J. M. (2020). Safe(r) by design implementation in the nanotechnology industry. NanoImpact, 20, 100267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2020.100267

Sebranek, J. G., & Bacus, J. N. (2007). Cured meat products without direct addition of nitrate or nitrite: What are the issues? Meat Science, 77(1), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.03.025

Tornberg, E. (2005). Effects of heat on meat proteins - Implications on structure and quality of meat products. Meat Science, 70(3), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.11.021

Downloads

Published

2026-04-06

How to Cite

Batrachenko, O., & Todorov, M. (2026). DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK-BASED APPROACH TO MEAT PRODUCT SAFETY. Biota. Human. Technology, (1), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.58407/bht.1.26.15

Issue

Section

FOOD TECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN HEALTH